![]() SmartGit is available for Windows, Mac and Linux. You can not only see what the commit was but the affected files as well. Read SmartGit reviews from real users, and view pricing and features of the Git GUI Clients software. QGit also has an excellent visual representation of your project’s history that’s intuitive to navigate. QGit has been around for a while, and it’s really refined its approach. If Gitg is the GNOME client, QGit is the Plasma/Qt one. Gitg is an excellent option if you’re looking for something simple that fits right in with your desktop. It presents you with the staged changes, and you can easily evaluate them right there and create your commit. Its commit screen is a little confusing at first, but its actually very easy to use once you get the hang of it. Gitg has a great visualization of the project’s history, and it lets you select your branch on the fly. GNOME’s minimalist design choices don’t mean that Gitg can’t do exactly what you need it to. Like many newer GNOME utilities, it’s sort of bare bones in appearance. Gitg is the default graphical Git client for the GNOME desktop. Additionally, GitEye has some neat features that allow you to track the history of a file and manage builds of a project via a build server. GitEye also makes browsing and checking out your branches very simple. It has an excellent file tree browser to the left of the screen. GitEye brings with it a more detailed interface. Instead, it comes packaged in binary form, and you can simply run it from its own directory. Interestingly, GitEye doesn’t install on your computer. It may not be open source, but it is freely available and free to use. GitEye is a cross-platform freeware client for Git. It lets you easily visualize the difference between commits in your files, and you can quickly navigate and browse between branches. Each displays a separate aspect of your project’s Git repo. The interface is broken down into four panes. Pro FeaturesConflict Solver and Compare (freely editable) Pull Requests, Comments for BitBucket, GitHub and provider. Since it’s open source, it’s also available in most distribution repositories, making it easy to update and maintain. Git Cola is written in Python and features a GTK interface, so it integrates perfectly with most desktops. Git Cola has been around for a decent amount of time, and it’s a classic example of an open-source Linux tool that does exactly what it needs to, without getting bogged down with a lot of unnecessary extras. => Making package: smartgit 21.1.2-1 (Wed 06:05:06 PM CEST)The following are some of the best graphical Git clients for Linux. ![]() => ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Platforms: Linux, Mac, Windows Price: 79/user / Free for non-commercial. => Validating source files with sha1sums. SmartGit helps Git and Mercurial beginners to get started quickly and let's advanced. > Downloading smartgit-linux-21_1_2.tar.gz. SmartGit for Linux is a graphical client for the Open Source version control systems Git, Mercurial and SVN. SmartGit supports GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. But what is the solution? I get this (see below), when I tried to upgrade today? :: (1/1) Parsing SRCINFO: smartgit Gerbv is a native Linux application, and it runs on many common UNIX platforms. In my opinion it would be appropriate to have two packages of smartgit - bundled with JRE and without it. If you want to update before this question will be sorted out you can change the hash for smartgit-linux-21_1_2.tar.gz to actual one "b38b7ba2a7fe2e272f32d6f423d953890c6e7840" in PKGBUILD before About the JRE. If they didn't change it then something strange is going on and should be investigated.Īll this based on my understanding of the process, I am not specialist, so correct me if I am wrong. We have tried it briefly and SmartGit seems to mostly work. If they admit that they changed the archive - then the packager should just update the hash. WSLg can be used to run SmartGit in Linux environment while using Windows as main development OS. I think (as packager) could verify my assumption and ask Smartgit devs why the hash was changed. Somehow I have 21.1.2-1 installed, but I can't find it's smartgit-linux-21_1_2.tar.gz in my yay cache so I can't prove the case. And some time later the archive was changed. Looks like at the time this package was updated smartgit-linux-21_1_2.tar.gz on the site had different hash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |